Demographics details for Central city, NE vs Cudahy, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, NE vs Cudahy, WI.
| Data | Central city | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,078 | 17,796 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $54,063 | $66,592 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Cudahy
- The population in Cudahy is higher at 17,796, compared to 3,078 in Central city.
- The median age in Cudahy is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 37.0 years in Central city.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592, compared to $54,063 in Central city.
- In Cudahy, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is higher in Cudahy at 11%, compared to 9% in Central city.
- Cudahy has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Cudahy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Central city | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 86 | 77 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 77% in Cudahy.
- The Asian population is larger in Central city at 3% compared to 2% in Cudahy.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cudahy at 9%, compared to 4% in Central city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Central city and Cudahy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Central city | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 26.4% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.5% in Central city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cudahy at 24.3% versus 18.6% in Central city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 20.0% in Central city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 44.9% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- Disability percentages are higher in Central city at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Cudahy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Central city | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (721) | 25.1% (4,460) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (178) | 9.9% (1,768) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (404) | 21.0% (3,730) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Central city.
- In Cudahy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 23.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cudahy at 9.9%, compared to 5.8% in Central city.
- In Cudahy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 13.1% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.