Demographics details for Central city, KY vs Hiawassee, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Central city, KY vs Hiawassee, GA.

Data Central city Hiawassee
Population 5,810 1,017
Median Age 33.5 years 56.5 years
Median Income $52,184 $40,917
Married Families 38.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 16% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.9

Population Comparison: Central city vs Hiawassee

  • In Central city, the population is higher at 5,810, compared to 1,017 in Hiawassee.
  • The median age in Hiawassee is higher at 56.5 years, compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
  • Central city has a higher median income of $52,184 compared to $40,917 in Hiawassee.
  • In Hiawassee, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Central city.
  • Central city has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Hiawassee.
  • The unemployment rate in Central city is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.9% in Hiawassee.

Demographics

Demographics Central city vs Hiawassee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Central city Hiawassee
Black 3 Data is updating
White 88 84
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 8
Two or More Races 6 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Hiawassee

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Central city at 3% compared to 0% in Hiawassee.
  • Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 84% in Hiawassee.
  • Both Central city and Hiawassee have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Hiawassee has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Central city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hiawassee at 8%, compared to 6% in Central city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central city at 1% compared to 0% in Hiawassee.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Central city Hiawassee
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 11.5%
Depression 26.8% 22.2%
Smoking 24.8% 16.4%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 16.4%
Obesity 41.9% 32.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Hiawassee

  • More residents in Central city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.3% in Hiawassee.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Central city at 26.8% compared to 22.2% in Hiawassee.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 24.8% compared to 16.4% in Hiawassee.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hiawassee at 16.4% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Central city at 41.9% compared to 32.4% in Hiawassee.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hiawassee at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Central city Hiawassee
No Schooling 1.1% (65) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.4% (897) 19.5% (198)
Less than High School 15.6% (905) 29.3% (298)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.3% (480) 26.5% (270)

Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Hiawassee

  • A higher percentage of residents in Central city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Hiawassee.
  • In Hiawassee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hiawassee at 29.3%, compared to 15.6% in Central city.
  • In Hiawassee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.