Demographics details for Central city, KY vs Deridder, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Central city, KY vs Deridder, LA.
Data | Central city | Deridder |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,810 | 9,624 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $52,184 | $56,607 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Central city vs Deridder
- The population in Deridder is higher at 9,624, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- The median age in Deridder is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Deridder has a higher median income of $56,607, compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Central city at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Deridder.
- The poverty level is higher in Deridder at 18%, compared to 16% in Central city.
- Deridder has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Central city vs Deridder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Central city | Deridder |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 32 |
White | 88 | 49 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Central city vs Deridder
- In Deridder, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 3% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 49% in Deridder.
- In Deridder, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Central city.
- Deridder has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Deridder at 11%, compared to 6% in Central city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Central city at 1% compared to 0% in Deridder.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Central city | Deridder |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 13.1% |
Depression | 26.8% | 27.1% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 41.9% | 42.3% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Central city vs Deridder
- More residents in Central city report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.0% in Deridder.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Deridder at 27.1% versus 26.8% in Central city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Central city at 24.8% compared to 21.5% in Deridder.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Deridder at 17.6% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Deridder has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 41.9% in Central city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Deridder at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Central city | Deridder |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (65) | 0.7% (67) |
High School Diploma | 15.4% (897) | 20.4% (1,963) |
Less than High School | 15.6% (905) | 13.7% (1,321) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.3% (480) | 15.6% (1,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Central city vs Deridder
- A higher percentage of residents in Central city have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Deridder.
- In Deridder, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- More residents in Central city have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 13.7% in Deridder.
- In Deridder, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.