Demographics details for Cedaredge, CO vs Methuen, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedaredge, CO vs Methuen, MA.
| Data | Cedaredge | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,365 | 53,241 |
| Median Age | 51.3 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $40,395 | $93,681 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Cedaredge vs Methuen
- The population in Methuen is higher at 53,241, compared to 2,365 in Cedaredge.
- Residents in Cedaredge have a higher median age of 51.3 years compared to 40.6 years in Methuen.
- Methuen has a higher median income of $93,681, compared to $40,395 in Cedaredge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedaredge at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Methuen.
- The poverty level is higher in Methuen at 8%, compared to 0% in Cedaredge.
- Methuen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Cedaredge.
Demographics
Demographics Cedaredge vs Methuen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedaredge | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 85 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedaredge vs Methuen
- In Methuen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Cedaredge.
- Cedaredge has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 51% in Methuen.
- In Methuen, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Cedaredge.
- Methuen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 10% in Cedaredge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Methuen at 10%, compared to 4% in Cedaredge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cedaredge at 1% compared to 0% in Methuen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedaredge | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 27.8% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedaredge vs Methuen
- More residents in Cedaredge report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.1% in Methuen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedaredge at 23.5% compared to 23.4% in Methuen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cedaredge at 19.1% compared to 14.1% in Methuen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Methuen at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Cedaredge.
- Methuen has higher obesity rates at 30.4% compared to 27.8% in Cedaredge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cedaredge at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Methuen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedaredge | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (10) | 1.4% (741) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (600) | 17.4% (9,266) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (302) | 13.9% (7,384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (490) | 21.3% (11,336) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedaredge vs Methuen
- In Methuen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Cedaredge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedaredge hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 17.4% in Methuen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Methuen at 13.9%, compared to 12.8% in Cedaredge.
- In Methuen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 20.7% in Cedaredge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.