Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Washington, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Washington, IN.
| Data | Cedar park | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,642 | 12,171 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $118,903 | $48,255 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Washington
- In Cedar park, the population is higher at 77,642, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- Residents in Cedar park have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903 compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar park at 45.0% compared to 38.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- The unemployment rate in Cedar park is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar park vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar park | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 55 | 76 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 76% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar park at 12% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar park at 20% compared to 12% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar park at 10% compared to 8% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar park and Washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar park | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.6% versus 24.1% in Cedar park.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar park | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 1.3% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,896) | 22.8% (2,771) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (3,156) | 20.2% (2,460) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (27,785) | 9.3% (1,129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 20.2%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.