Demographics details for Cedar park, TX vs Charlotte, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cedar park, TX vs Charlotte, NC.
| Data | Cedar park | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,642 | 897,720 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $118,903 | $74,070 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Cedar park vs Charlotte
- The population in Charlotte is higher at 897,720, compared to 77,642 in Cedar park.
- Residents in Cedar park have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 34.5 years in Charlotte.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903 compared to $74,070 in Charlotte.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar park at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Charlotte.
- The poverty level is higher in Charlotte at 12%, compared to 5% in Cedar park.
- Charlotte has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Cedar park vs Charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cedar park | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 34 |
| White | 55 | 38 |
| Asian | 12 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cedar park vs Charlotte
- In Charlotte, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 38% in Charlotte.
- The Asian population is larger in Cedar park at 12% compared to 6% in Charlotte.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar park at 20% compared to 15% in Charlotte.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cedar park at 10% compared to 7% in Charlotte.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar park and Charlotte at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cedar park | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 13.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar park vs Charlotte
- More residents in Cedar park report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cedar park at 24.1% compared to 20.1% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has a higher smoking rate at 13.9% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 17.5% in Charlotte.
- Charlotte has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Cedar park and Charlotte at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cedar park | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 1.2% (10,429) |
| High School Diploma | 8.9% (6,896) | 9.4% (84,002) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (3,156) | 10.7% (95,990) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (27,785) | 30.6% (274,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cedar park vs Charlotte
- In Charlotte, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
- In Charlotte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.4% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charlotte at 10.7%, compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cedar park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 30.6% in Charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.