Demographics details for Cedar lake, IN vs Cleveland, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cedar lake, IN vs Cleveland, MS.

Data Cedar lake Cleveland
Population 15,592 10,545
Median Age 39.5 years 33.8 years
Median Income $84,444 $42,005
Married Families 40.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 5% 24%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.6

Population Comparison: Cedar lake vs Cleveland

  • In Cedar lake, the population is higher at 15,592, compared to 10,545 in Cleveland.
  • Residents in Cedar lake have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 33.8 years in Cleveland.
  • Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444 compared to $42,005 in Cleveland.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cedar lake at 40.0% compared to 27.0% in Cleveland.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cleveland at 24%, compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
  • Cleveland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.

Demographics

Demographics Cedar lake vs Cleveland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cedar lake Cleveland
Black Data is updating 56
White 94 36
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 3 1
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Cleveland

  • In Cleveland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 36% in Cleveland.
  • In Cleveland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cedar lake.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cedar lake at 3% compared to 1% in Cleveland.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleveland at 5%, compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cedar lake and Cleveland at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cedar lake Cleveland
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 13.8%
Depression 25.4% 20.4%
Smoking 18.8% 21.0%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 12.7%
Obesity 37.2% 41.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cedar lake vs Cleveland

  • In Cleveland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cedar lake at 25.4% compared to 20.4% in Cleveland.
  • Cleveland has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 18.8% in Cedar lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 12.7% in Cleveland.
  • Cleveland has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleveland at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cedar lake Cleveland
No Schooling 0.4% (67) 0.9% (99)
High School Diploma 21.1% (3,292) 10.0% (1,059)
Less than High School 7.1% (1,102) 13.3% (1,404)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.1% (2,204) 21.3% (2,242)

Education Levels Comparison: Cedar lake vs Cleveland

  • In Cleveland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cedar lake hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 10.0% in Cleveland.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleveland at 13.3%, compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
  • In Cleveland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.