Demographics details for Cecil, WI vs South portland, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cecil, WI vs South portland, ME.
Data | Cecil | South portland |
---|---|---|
Population | 528 | 27,026 |
Median Age | 48.7 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $74,423 | $82,489 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Cecil vs South portland
- The population in South portland is higher at 27,026, compared to 528 in Cecil.
- Residents in Cecil have a higher median age of 48.7 years compared to 41.0 years in South portland.
- South portland has a higher median income of $82,489, compared to $74,423 in Cecil.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cecil at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in South portland.
- The poverty level is higher in South portland at 7%, compared to 5% in Cecil.
- The unemployment rate in Cecil is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.4% in South portland.
Demographics
Demographics Cecil vs South portland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cecil | South portland |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 7 |
White | 93 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cecil vs South portland
- In South portland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Cecil.
- Cecil has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 83% in South portland.
- In South portland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cecil.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cecil and South portland at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South portland at 5%, compared to 4% in Cecil.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cecil and South portland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cecil | South portland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 8.5% |
Depression | 24.1% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 12.2% |
Binge Drinking | 24.4% | 20.1% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 26.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cecil vs South portland
- More residents in Cecil report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cecil at 24.1% compared to 23.8% in South portland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cecil at 17.4% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cecil at 24.4% compared to 20.1% in South portland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cecil at 35.0% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South portland at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Cecil.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cecil | South portland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (7) | 0.3% (93) |
High School Diploma | 26.5% (140) | 13.2% (3,562) |
Less than High School | 8.3% (44) | 4.4% (1,202) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (68) | 35.5% (9,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cecil vs South portland
- A higher percentage of residents in Cecil have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in South portland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cecil hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
- More residents in Cecil have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 4.4% in South portland.
- In South portland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 12.9% in Cecil.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.