Demographics details for Cave city, AR vs Thornton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cave city, AR vs Thornton, CO.
| Data | Cave city | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,979 | 143,282 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $40,441 | $95,064 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cave city vs Thornton
- The population in Thornton is higher at 143,282, compared to 1,979 in Cave city.
- Residents in Cave city have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064, compared to $40,441 in Cave city.
- In Thornton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Cave city.
- Cave city has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Thornton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cave city and Thornton at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Cave city vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cave city | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 39 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cave city vs Thornton
- In Thornton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Cave city.
- Cave city has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- In Thornton, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Cave city.
- Thornton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 4% in Cave city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thornton at 15%, compared to 2% in Cave city.
- In Thornton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cave city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cave city | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.3% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 31.3% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 27.9% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 21.0% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cave city vs Thornton
- More residents in Cave city report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cave city at 31.3% compared to 22.0% in Thornton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cave city at 27.9% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 13.9% in Cave city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cave city at 40.5% compared to 30.1% in Thornton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cave city at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cave city | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (25) | 1.7% (2,448) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (409) | 13.2% (18,983) |
| Less than High School | 29.4% (582) | 14.7% (20,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (118) | 19.3% (27,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cave city vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.3% in Cave city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cave city hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 13.2% in Thornton.
- More residents in Cave city have less than a high school education at 29.4% compared to 14.7% in Thornton.
- In Thornton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 6.0% in Cave city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.