Demographics details for Cashion, OK vs Pleasanton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cashion, OK vs Pleasanton, CA.
Data | Cashion | Pleasanton |
---|---|---|
Population | 892 | 76,689 |
Median Age | 33.3 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $96,705 | $181,639 |
Married Families | 58.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Cashion vs Pleasanton
- The population in Pleasanton is higher at 76,689, compared to 892 in Cashion.
- The median age in Pleasanton is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 33.3 years in Cashion.
- Pleasanton has a higher median income of $181,639, compared to $96,705 in Cashion.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cashion at 58.0% compared to 53.0% in Pleasanton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cashion and Pleasanton at 7%.
- Pleasanton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Cashion.
Demographics
Demographics Cashion vs Pleasanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cashion | Pleasanton |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 2 |
White | 53 | 37 |
Asian | Data is updating | 42 |
Hispanic | 22 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 22 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cashion vs Pleasanton
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cashion and Pleasanton at 2%.
- Cashion has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 37% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, the Asian population stands at 42%, greater than 0% in Cashion.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cashion at 22% compared to 12% in Pleasanton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cashion at 22% compared to 7% in Pleasanton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cashion at 1% compared to 0% in Pleasanton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cashion | Pleasanton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 13.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 7.3% |
Depression | 24.0% | 17.6% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 7.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 36.9% | 22.9% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cashion vs Pleasanton
- More residents in Cashion report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 13.1% in Pleasanton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cashion at 24.0% compared to 17.6% in Pleasanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cashion at 15.4% compared to 7.2% in Pleasanton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pleasanton at 17.2% compared to 15.9% in Cashion.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cashion at 36.9% compared to 22.9% in Pleasanton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cashion at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Pleasanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cashion | Pleasanton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (407) |
High School Diploma | 25.8% (230) | 6.2% (4,722) |
Less than High School | 5.2% (46) | 3.8% (2,941) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (218) | 49.3% (37,825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cashion vs Pleasanton
- In Pleasanton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Cashion.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cashion hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 6.2% in Pleasanton.
- More residents in Cashion have less than a high school education at 5.2% compared to 3.8% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 24.4% in Cashion.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.