Demographics details for Carolina, RI vs Lawrence, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carolina, RI vs Lawrence, KS.
| Data | Carolina | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,165 | 95,794 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $92,419 | $59,834 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Carolina vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 95,794, compared to 1,165 in Carolina.
- Residents in Carolina have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Carolina has a higher median income of $92,419 compared to $59,834 in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carolina at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 12%, compared to 4% in Carolina.
- The unemployment rate in Carolina is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Carolina vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carolina | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 98 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Carolina vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Carolina.
- Carolina has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 71% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Carolina.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Carolina.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 9%, compared to 2% in Carolina.
- In Lawrence, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Carolina.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carolina | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carolina vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.5% in Carolina.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carolina at 25.2% compared to 22.3% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 12.2% in Carolina.
- Binge drinking is more common in Carolina at 20.8% compared to 19.6% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has higher obesity rates at 32.8% compared to 25.6% in Carolina.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lawrence at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Carolina.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carolina | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (466) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (174) | 8.2% (7,882) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (110) | 4.0% (3,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (268) | 31.1% (29,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carolina vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Carolina.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carolina hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Carolina have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 23.0% in Carolina.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.