Demographics details for Carmichaels, PA vs Fort valley, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Carmichaels, PA vs Fort valley, GA.

Data Carmichaels Fort valley
Population 416 8,838
Median Age 49.5 years 30.6 years
Median Income $80,909 $31,807
Married Families 45.0% 18.0%
Poverty Level 8% 25%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Carmichaels vs Fort valley

  • The population in Fort valley is higher at 8,838, compared to 416 in Carmichaels.
  • Residents in Carmichaels have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
  • Carmichaels has a higher median income of $80,909 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Carmichaels at 45.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 8% in Carmichaels.
  • The unemployment rate in Carmichaels is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.

Demographics

Demographics Carmichaels vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Carmichaels Fort valley
Black Data is updating 70
White 91 18
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 8
Two or More Races 6 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Carmichaels vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Carmichaels.
  • Carmichaels has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
  • Both Carmichaels and Fort valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Carmichaels.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Carmichaels at 6% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carmichaels and Fort valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Carmichaels Fort valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 15.5%
Depression 24.7% 19.5%
Smoking 21.7% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 11.8%
Obesity 37.0% 46.2%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Carmichaels vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.8% in Carmichaels.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Carmichaels at 24.7% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 21.7% in Carmichaels.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Carmichaels at 18.4% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 37.0% in Carmichaels.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Carmichaels at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Fort valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Carmichaels Fort valley
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.0% (267)
High School Diploma 27.6% (115) 13.9% (1,226)
Less than High School 14.4% (60) 17.3% (1,527)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.7% (61) 10.8% (954)

Education Levels Comparison: Carmichaels vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Carmichaels.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carmichaels hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 14.4% in Carmichaels.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Carmichaels hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.7% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.