Demographics details for Carbon, TX vs Green, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carbon, TX vs Green, OH.
| Data | Carbon | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 285 | 27,269 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,833 | $90,419 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Carbon vs Green
- The population in Green is higher at 27,269, compared to 285 in Carbon.
- The median age in Green is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 40.9 years in Carbon.
- Green has a higher median income of $90,419, compared to $55,833 in Carbon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Carbon at 49.0% compared to 45.0% in Green.
- Carbon has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Green.
- Green has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Carbon.
Demographics
Demographics Carbon vs Green provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Carbon | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 38 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 38 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 24 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Carbon vs Green
- In Green, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Carbon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Green at 94% compared to 38% in Carbon.
- In Green, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Carbon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Carbon at 38% compared to 1% in Green.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Carbon at 24% compared to 3% in Green.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Carbon and Green at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Carbon | Green |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carbon vs Green
- More residents in Carbon report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 16.6% in Green.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carbon at 27.6% compared to 24.7% in Green.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carbon at 23.9% compared to 17.4% in Green.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Green at 19.1% compared to 17.5% in Carbon.
- Green has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 39.6% in Carbon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carbon at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Green.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Carbon | Green |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (2) | 0.2% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 28.1% (80) | 16.6% (4,514) |
| Less than High School | 29.5% (84) | 3.0% (828) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (25) | 29.3% (7,977) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carbon vs Green
- A higher percentage of residents in Carbon have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Green.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carbon hold a high school diploma at 28.1% compared to 16.6% in Green.
- More residents in Carbon have less than a high school education at 29.5% compared to 3.0% in Green.
- In Green, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.3% compared to 8.8% in Carbon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.