Demographics details for Carbon hill, AL vs Westminster, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Carbon hill, AL vs Westminster, CO.
Data | Carbon hill | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,727 | 114,533 |
Median Age | 45.1 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $27,581 | $90,651 |
Married Families | 21.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Carbon hill vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 114,533, compared to 1,727 in Carbon hill.
- Residents in Carbon hill have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 37.4 years in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $90,651, compared to $27,581 in Carbon hill.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 21.0% in Carbon hill.
- Carbon hill has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 9% in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Carbon hill.
Demographics
Demographics Carbon hill vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Carbon hill | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 1 |
White | 87 | 58 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 2 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Carbon hill vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Carbon hill at 10% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- Carbon hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 58% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Carbon hill.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 2% in Carbon hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Westminster at 11%, compared to 1% in Carbon hill.
- In Westminster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Carbon hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Carbon hill | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 9.6% |
Depression | 26.3% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 23.9% | 13.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 21.5% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 26.9% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Carbon hill vs Westminster
- More residents in Carbon hill report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 14.2% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Carbon hill at 26.3% compared to 21.1% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Carbon hill at 23.9% compared to 13.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Westminster at 21.5% compared to 14.6% in Carbon hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Carbon hill at 39.2% compared to 26.9% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Carbon hill at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Carbon hill | Westminster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (32) | 0.9% (1,007) |
High School Diploma | 15.9% (275) | 11.9% (13,626) |
Less than High School | 33.4% (577) | 10.3% (11,853) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.2% (56) | 30.3% (34,676) |
Education Levels Comparison: Carbon hill vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of residents in Carbon hill have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.9% in Westminster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Carbon hill hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 11.9% in Westminster.
- More residents in Carbon hill have less than a high school education at 33.4% compared to 10.3% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 3.2% in Carbon hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.