Demographics details for Camp meeker, CA vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Camp meeker, CA vs Cochran, GA.
Data | Camp meeker | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Population | 55 | 4,647 |
Median Age | 55.0 years | 28.9 years |
Median Income | $85,000 | $31,326 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Camp meeker vs Cochran
- The population in Cochran is higher at 4,647, compared to 55 in Camp meeker.
- Residents in Camp meeker have a higher median age of 55.0 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Camp meeker has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Camp meeker at 40.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 5% in Camp meeker.
- Cochran has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Camp meeker.
Demographics
Demographics Camp meeker vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Camp meeker | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 53 |
White | 90 | 40 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Camp meeker vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 1% in Camp meeker.
- Camp meeker has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- In Cochran, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Camp meeker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Camp meeker at 3% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Camp meeker at 5% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Camp meeker and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Camp meeker | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.7% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 21.8% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 13.6% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Camp meeker vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cochran at 21.8% versus 0.0% in Camp meeker.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochran at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
- Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Camp meeker | Cochran |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (54) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.2% (569) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.1% (703) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Camp meeker vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
- In Cochran, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
- In Cochran, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Camp meeker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.