Demographics details for Cambridge, OH vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, OH vs South jordan, UT.
| Data | Cambridge | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,985 | 83,513 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $39,589 | $119,822 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Cambridge have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cambridge at 6% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Cambridge.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 26.2% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 46.4% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs South jordan
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 25.9% in Cambridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 26.2% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Cambridge and South jordan at 16.9%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 46.4% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (73) | 0.2% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (2,502) | 8.4% (6,995) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (1,732) | 2.7% (2,236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (875) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.