Demographics details for Cambridge, NE vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, NE vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Cambridge | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,081 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 10,828, compared to 1,081 in Cambridge.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 42.4 years in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher median income of $61,250 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cambridge at 54.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.2% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 49 |
| White | 91 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 41% in Washington.
- Both Cambridge and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cambridge at 7% compared to 6% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 3%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.0% in Cambridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 22.8% versus 18.1% in Cambridge.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 19.4% in Cambridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 20.9% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 42.2% in Cambridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Cambridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (5) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (173) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (169) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (232) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Cambridge.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Cambridge.
- More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.