Demographics details for Cambridge, NE vs Jefferson city, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, NE vs Jefferson city, MO.
| Data | Cambridge | Jefferson city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,081 | 42,528 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $63,649 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Jefferson city
- The population in Jefferson city is higher at 42,528, compared to 1,081 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Cambridge have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 38.5 years in Jefferson city.
- Jefferson city has a higher median income of $63,649, compared to $61,250 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cambridge at 54.0% compared to 37.0% in Jefferson city.
- The poverty level is higher in Jefferson city at 11%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- Jefferson city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Jefferson city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Jefferson city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 18 |
| White | 91 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Jefferson city
- In Jefferson city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 72% in Jefferson city.
- In Jefferson city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cambridge at 7% compared to 3% in Jefferson city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jefferson city at 4%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cambridge and Jefferson city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Jefferson city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Jefferson city
- In Jefferson city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.0% in Cambridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jefferson city at 22.6% versus 18.1% in Cambridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 19.4% compared to 18.6% in Jefferson city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cambridge at 20.9% compared to 16.9% in Jefferson city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 42.2% compared to 37.4% in Jefferson city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Jefferson city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (5) | 0.5% (233) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (173) | 15.9% (6,767) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (169) | 11.0% (4,659) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (232) | 24.8% (10,543) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Jefferson city
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cambridge and Jefferson city at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 15.9% in Jefferson city.
- More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson city.
- In Jefferson city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 21.5% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.