Demographics details for Cambridge, NE vs Helena, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cambridge, NE vs Helena, MT.
| Data | Cambridge | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,081 | 33,885 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $64,798 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Cambridge vs Helena
- The population in Helena is higher at 33,885, compared to 1,081 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Cambridge have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 39.9 years in Helena.
- Helena has a higher median income of $64,798, compared to $61,250 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cambridge at 54.0% compared to 34.0% in Helena.
- The poverty level is higher in Helena at 10%, compared to 8% in Cambridge.
- The unemployment rate in Cambridge is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Helena.
Demographics
Demographics Cambridge vs Helena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cambridge | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 91 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cambridge vs Helena
- In Helena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 88% in Helena.
- In Helena, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cambridge at 7% compared to 5% in Helena.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Helena at 4%, compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- In Helena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cambridge | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 13.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 42.2% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cambridge vs Helena
- More residents in Cambridge report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.8% in Helena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Helena at 23.5% versus 18.1% in Cambridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cambridge at 19.4% compared to 13.1% in Helena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Helena at 21.9% compared to 20.9% in Cambridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cambridge at 42.2% compared to 30.4% in Helena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cambridge at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Helena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cambridge | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (5) | 0.1% (38) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (173) | 10.0% (3,385) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (169) | 4.7% (1,597) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (232) | 34.3% (11,632) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cambridge vs Helena
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Helena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cambridge hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Helena.
- More residents in Cambridge have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 4.7% in Helena.
- In Helena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 21.5% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.