Demographics details for Calpine, CA vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Calpine, CA vs Tacoma, WA.
Data | Calpine | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Population | 95 | 221,776 |
Median Age | 13.8 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $97,031 | $79,085 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Calpine vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 95 in Calpine.
- The median age in Tacoma is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 13.8 years in Calpine.
- Calpine has a higher median income of $97,031 compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Calpine.
- The poverty level is higher in Tacoma at 11%, compared to 0% in Calpine.
- The unemployment rate in Calpine is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.9% in Tacoma.
Demographics
Demographics Calpine vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Calpine | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 11 |
White | 100 | 53 |
Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Calpine vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Calpine.
- Calpine has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Calpine.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Calpine.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 0% in Calpine.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Calpine.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Calpine | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 11.9% |
Depression | 21.8% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 30.9% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Calpine vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.7% in Calpine.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 21.8% in Calpine.
- Tacoma has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 15.3% in Calpine.
- Binge drinking is more common in Calpine at 18.2% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 30.9% in Calpine.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Calpine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Calpine | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (3,474) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 14.2% (31,504) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.1% (22,501) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (19) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Calpine vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Calpine.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Calpine.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 0.0% in Calpine.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Calpine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.