Demographics details for Cainsville, MO vs Lancaster, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cainsville, MO vs Lancaster, CA.

Data Cainsville Lancaster
Population 284 169,185
Median Age 44.2 years 33.6 years
Median Income $35,000 $71,367
Married Families 20.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 13% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 8.2

Population Comparison: Cainsville vs Lancaster

  • The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 284 in Cainsville.
  • Residents in Cainsville have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $35,000 in Cainsville.
  • In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 20.0% in Cainsville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 13% in Cainsville.
  • Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 3.5% in Cainsville.

Demographics

Demographics Cainsville vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cainsville Lancaster
Black Data is updating 21
White 93 10
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 3 46
Two or More Races 4 18
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Cainsville vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Cainsville.
  • Cainsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
  • In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Cainsville.
  • Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 3% in Cainsville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 4% in Cainsville.
  • In Lancaster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cainsville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cainsville Lancaster
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 13.5%
Depression 26.6% 17.7%
Smoking 25.2% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 15.1%
Obesity 44.2% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cainsville vs Lancaster

  • More residents in Cainsville report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cainsville at 26.6% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cainsville at 25.2% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cainsville at 17.1% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cainsville at 44.2% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cainsville at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cainsville Lancaster
No Schooling 0.4% (1) 2.0% (3,403)
High School Diploma 21.5% (61) 17.5% (29,555)
Less than High School 4.2% (12) 21.5% (36,421)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.2% (9) 12.3% (20,861)

Education Levels Comparison: Cainsville vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Cainsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cainsville hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 4.2% in Cainsville.
  • In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 3.2% in Cainsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.