Demographics details for Caddo, OK vs College park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Caddo, OK vs College park, MD.
Data | Caddo | College park |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,198 | 34,190 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 21.6 years |
Median Income | $52,443 | $76,973 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 17.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Caddo vs College park
- The population in College park is higher at 34,190, compared to 26,198 in Caddo.
- Residents in Caddo have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- College park has a higher median income of $76,973, compared to $52,443 in Caddo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Caddo at 35.0% compared to 17.0% in College park.
- Caddo has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in College park.
- College park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 4.0% in Caddo.
Demographics
Demographics Caddo vs College park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Caddo | College park |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 23 |
White | 49 | 39 |
Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
Hispanic | 15 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
American Indian | 19 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Caddo vs College park
- In College park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 4% in Caddo.
- Caddo has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 39% in College park.
- In College park, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Caddo.
- College park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 15% in Caddo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Caddo at 13% compared to 7% in College park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Caddo at 19% compared to 0% in College park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Caddo | College park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Depression | 24.6% | 15.4% |
Smoking | 24.1% | 12.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 12.8% |
Obesity | 43.7% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Caddo vs College park
- More residents in Caddo report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Caddo at 24.6% compared to 15.4% in College park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Caddo at 24.1% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Caddo at 14.1% compared to 12.8% in College park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Caddo at 43.7% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Caddo at 20.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Caddo | College park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (169) | 1.9% (657) |
High School Diploma | 27.1% (7,102) | 6.4% (2,199) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (4,281) | 9.4% (3,210) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (2,757) | 19.8% (6,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Caddo vs College park
- In College park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.6% in Caddo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Caddo hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- More residents in Caddo have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 9.4% in College park.
- In College park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 10.5% in Caddo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.