Demographics details for Byfield, MA vs Fort atkinson, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Byfield, MA vs Fort atkinson, WI.

Data Byfield Fort atkinson
Population 1,410 12,412
Median Age 42.0 years 42.0 years
Median Income $109,000 $72,215
Married Families 69.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 5% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Byfield vs Fort atkinson

  • The population in Fort atkinson is higher at 12,412, compared to 1,410 in Byfield.
  • The median age is the same in both Byfield and Fort atkinson at 42.0 years.
  • Byfield has a higher median income of $109,000 compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Byfield at 69.0% compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort atkinson at 9%, compared to 5% in Byfield.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Byfield.

Demographics

Demographics Byfield vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Byfield Fort atkinson
Black 2 Data is updating
White 95 89
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 8
Two or More Races 1 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Byfield vs Fort atkinson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Byfield at 2% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Byfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 89% in Fort atkinson.
  • The Asian population is larger in Byfield at 1% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Byfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort atkinson at 3%, compared to 1% in Byfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Byfield and Fort atkinson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Byfield Fort atkinson
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.2%
Depression Data is updating% 23.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 16.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 23.5%
Obesity Data is updating% 34.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Byfield vs Fort atkinson

  • In Fort atkinson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Byfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 0.0% in Byfield.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Byfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Byfield.
  • Fort atkinson has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 0.0% in Byfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Byfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Byfield Fort atkinson
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.3% (160)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.8% (2,578)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.9% (1,595)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.6% (2,436)

Education Levels Comparison: Byfield vs Fort atkinson

  • In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Byfield.
  • In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Byfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort atkinson at 12.9%, compared to 0.0% in Byfield.
  • In Fort atkinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Byfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.