Demographics details for Burkesville, KY vs Marshall, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burkesville, KY vs Marshall, TX.
Data | Burkesville | Marshall |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,380 | 23,641 |
Median Age | 51.6 years | 34.1 years |
Median Income | $26,563 | $49,162 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Burkesville vs Marshall
- The population in Marshall is higher at 23,641, compared to 1,380 in Burkesville.
- Residents in Burkesville have a higher median age of 51.6 years compared to 34.1 years in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $49,162, compared to $26,563 in Burkesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burkesville at 29.0% compared to 27.0% in Marshall.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 17%, compared to 14% in Burkesville.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Burkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Burkesville vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Burkesville | Marshall |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 40 |
White | 83 | 28 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burkesville vs Marshall
- In Marshall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 11% in Burkesville.
- Burkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- Both Burkesville and Marshall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 3% in Burkesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshall at 11%, compared to 2% in Burkesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burkesville and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Burkesville | Marshall |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.8% | 13.8% |
Depression | 29.6% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 27.1% | 21.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 43.9% | 42.0% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burkesville vs Marshall
- More residents in Burkesville report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 19.2% in Marshall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burkesville at 29.6% compared to 22.7% in Marshall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burkesville at 27.1% compared to 21.0% in Marshall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Marshall at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Burkesville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Burkesville at 43.9% compared to 42.0% in Marshall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burkesville at 28.0% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Burkesville | Marshall |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (8) | 0.8% (195) |
High School Diploma | 32.7% (451) | 18.7% (4,412) |
Less than High School | 35.8% (494) | 10.7% (2,527) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (72) | 13.2% (3,127) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burkesville vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Burkesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkesville hold a high school diploma at 32.7% compared to 18.7% in Marshall.
- More residents in Burkesville have less than a high school education at 35.8% compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 5.2% in Burkesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.