Demographics details for Buffalo gap, TX vs South portland, ME

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Buffalo gap, TX vs South portland, ME.

Data Buffalo gap South portland
Population 589 27,026
Median Age 36.4 years 41.0 years
Median Income $52,404 $82,489
Married Families 34.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.4

Population Comparison: Buffalo gap vs South portland

  • The population in South portland is higher at 27,026, compared to 589 in Buffalo gap.
  • The median age in South portland is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Buffalo gap.
  • South portland has a higher median income of $82,489, compared to $52,404 in Buffalo gap.
  • In South portland, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Buffalo gap.
  • Buffalo gap has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in South portland.
  • The unemployment rate in Buffalo gap is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.4% in South portland.

Demographics

Demographics Buffalo gap vs South portland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Buffalo gap South portland
Black 3 7
White 78 83
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 16 3
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Buffalo gap vs South portland

  • In South portland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 3% in Buffalo gap.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South portland at 83% compared to 78% in Buffalo gap.
  • In South portland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Buffalo gap.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Buffalo gap at 16% compared to 3% in South portland.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South portland at 5%, compared to 3% in Buffalo gap.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Buffalo gap and South portland at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Buffalo gap South portland
Mental Health Not Good 16.1% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 8.5%
Depression 23.4% 23.8%
Smoking 13.7% 12.2%
Binge Drinking 20.3% 20.1%
Obesity 30.8% 26.2%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Buffalo gap vs South portland

  • More residents in Buffalo gap report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South portland at 23.8% versus 23.4% in Buffalo gap.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Buffalo gap at 13.7% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Buffalo gap at 20.3% compared to 20.1% in South portland.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Buffalo gap at 30.8% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Buffalo gap at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in South portland.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Buffalo gap South portland
No Schooling 1.2% (7) 0.3% (93)
High School Diploma 22.9% (135) 13.2% (3,562)
Less than High School 11.2% (66) 4.4% (1,202)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.8% (99) 35.5% (9,604)

Education Levels Comparison: Buffalo gap vs South portland

  • A higher percentage of residents in Buffalo gap have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in South portland.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Buffalo gap hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
  • More residents in Buffalo gap have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 4.4% in South portland.
  • In South portland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 16.8% in Buffalo gap.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.