Demographics details for Buckeye, AZ vs Logansport, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Buckeye, AZ vs Logansport, IN.
Data | Buckeye | Logansport |
---|---|---|
Population | 105,567 | 18,194 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 37.3 years |
Median Income | $94,188 | $45,335 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Buckeye vs Logansport
- In Buckeye, the population is higher at 105,567, compared to 18,194 in Logansport.
- The median age in Logansport is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 34.7 years in Buckeye.
- Buckeye has a higher median income of $94,188 compared to $45,335 in Logansport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Buckeye at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Logansport.
- The poverty level is higher in Logansport at 12%, compared to 10% in Buckeye.
- The unemployment rate in Buckeye is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.5% in Logansport.
Demographics
Demographics Buckeye vs Logansport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Buckeye | Logansport |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 2 |
White | 40 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 40 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Buckeye vs Logansport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Buckeye at 5% compared to 2% in Logansport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Logansport at 56% compared to 40% in Buckeye.
- Both Buckeye and Logansport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Buckeye at 40% compared to 30% in Logansport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Buckeye at 12% compared to 9% in Logansport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Buckeye and Logansport at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Buckeye | Logansport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 14.3% |
Depression | 19.1% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 32.8% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Buckeye vs Logansport
- In Logansport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.5% in Buckeye.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Logansport at 25.9% versus 19.1% in Buckeye.
- Logansport has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 16.6% in Buckeye.
- Binge drinking is more common in Buckeye at 17.9% compared to 16.1% in Logansport.
- Logansport has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 32.8% in Buckeye.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Logansport at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Buckeye.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Buckeye | Logansport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (998) | 1.4% (262) |
High School Diploma | 12.5% (13,191) | 24.1% (4,392) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (13,586) | 25.2% (4,582) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (14,167) | 7.5% (1,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: Buckeye vs Logansport
- In Logansport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Buckeye.
- In Logansport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 12.5% in Buckeye.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Logansport at 25.2%, compared to 12.9% in Buckeye.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buckeye hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 7.5% in Logansport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.