Demographics details for Bruce, MS vs Sylvania, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bruce, MS vs Sylvania, GA.
| Data | Bruce | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,632 | 2,602 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $30,094 | $36,682 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Bruce vs Sylvania
- The population in Sylvania is higher at 2,602, compared to 1,632 in Bruce.
- The median age in Sylvania is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 36.1 years in Bruce.
- Sylvania has a higher median income of $36,682, compared to $30,094 in Bruce.
- In Sylvania, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 23.0% in Bruce.
- The poverty level is higher in Sylvania at 18%, compared to 15% in Bruce.
- Sylvania has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Bruce.
Demographics
Demographics Bruce vs Sylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bruce | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 57 |
| White | 52 | 40 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bruce vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 45% in Bruce.
- Bruce has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 40% in Sylvania.
- Both Bruce and Sylvania have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sylvania has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Bruce.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bruce at 3% compared to 2% in Sylvania.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bruce and Sylvania at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bruce | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bruce vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Bruce.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bruce at 22.1% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bruce at 22.9% compared to 21.8% in Sylvania.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sylvania at 13.6% compared to 12.7% in Bruce.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bruce at 43.0% compared to 40.5% in Sylvania.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bruce at 31.0% compared to 16.0% in Sylvania.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bruce | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (2) | 0.3% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (265) | 27.1% (704) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (248) | 18.6% (485) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (189) | 10.4% (271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bruce vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Bruce.
- In Sylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 16.2% in Bruce.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sylvania at 18.6%, compared to 15.2% in Bruce.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bruce hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 10.4% in Sylvania.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.