Demographics details for Brookline, MA vs Cuyahoga falls, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Brookline, MA vs Cuyahoga falls, OH.

Data Brookline Cuyahoga falls
Population 62,698 50,655
Median Age 35.1 years 37.8 years
Median Income $130,600 $67,922
Married Families 38.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 7% 7%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Brookline vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Brookline, the population is higher at 62,698, compared to 50,655 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The median age in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 35.1 years in Brookline.
  • Brookline has a higher median income of $130,600 compared to $67,922 in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Brookline.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Brookline and Cuyahoga falls at 7%.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 2.5% in Brookline.

Demographics

Demographics Brookline vs Cuyahoga falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Brookline Cuyahoga falls
Black 3 5
White 64 81
Asian 18 6
Hispanic 7 3
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Brookline vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Brookline.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 81% compared to 64% in Brookline.
  • The Asian population is larger in Brookline at 18% compared to 6% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Brookline at 7% compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Brookline at 8% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brookline and Cuyahoga falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Brookline Cuyahoga falls
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 11.1%
Depression 19.5% 25.1%
Smoking 8.1% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 18.8%
Obesity 22.9% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Brookline vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.7% in Brookline.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% versus 19.5% in Brookline.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 8.1% in Brookline.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 18.1% in Brookline.
  • Cuyahoga falls has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 22.9% in Brookline.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cuyahoga falls at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Brookline.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Brookline Cuyahoga falls
No Schooling 0.5% (288) 1.6% (825)
High School Diploma 3.2% (1,995) 19.4% (9,813)
Less than High School 2.3% (1,437) 6.3% (3,197)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 56.6% (35,500) 26.1% (13,215)

Education Levels Comparison: Brookline vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Brookline.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 3.2% in Brookline.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 6.3%, compared to 2.3% in Brookline.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Brookline hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.6% compared to 26.1% in Cuyahoga falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.