Demographics details for Brookhaven, GA vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookhaven, GA vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Brookhaven | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,934 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 34.6 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $114,570 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Brookhaven vs Spanish fork
- In Brookhaven, the population is higher at 57,934, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
- Residents in Brookhaven have a higher median age of 34.6 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Brookhaven has a higher median income of $114,570 compared to $93,989 in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 36.0% in Brookhaven.
- Brookhaven has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 2.6% in Brookhaven.
Demographics
Demographics Brookhaven vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brookhaven | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 1 |
White | 53 | 80 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 17 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brookhaven at 12% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 53% in Brookhaven.
- The Asian population is larger in Brookhaven at 7% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brookhaven at 17% compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brookhaven at 9% compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Brookhaven at 2% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brookhaven | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 10.8% |
Depression | 17.8% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 10.0% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 27.2% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 13.1% in Brookhaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 17.8% in Brookhaven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brookhaven at 10.0% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookhaven at 16.2% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 27.2% in Brookhaven.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spanish fork at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in Brookhaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brookhaven | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (341) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 5.1% (2,980) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 8.0% (4,642) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.3% (29,125) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookhaven vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookhaven have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.1% compared to 5.1% in Brookhaven.
- More residents in Brookhaven have less than a high school education at 8.0% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookhaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.