Demographics details for Brookfield, WI vs Columbia, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookfield, WI vs Columbia, SC.
Data | Brookfield | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Population | 41,958 | 139,698 |
Median Age | 43.8 years | 28.3 years |
Median Income | $121,837 | $54,095 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Brookfield vs Columbia
- The population in Columbia is higher at 139,698, compared to 41,958 in Brookfield.
- Residents in Brookfield have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 28.3 years in Columbia.
- Brookfield has a higher median income of $121,837 compared to $54,095 in Columbia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Brookfield at 51.0% compared to 25.0% in Columbia.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbia at 17%, compared to 4% in Brookfield.
- Columbia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.3% in Brookfield.
Demographics
Demographics Brookfield vs Columbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brookfield | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 40 |
White | 79 | 48 |
Asian | 11 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brookfield vs Columbia
- In Columbia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Brookfield.
- Brookfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 48% in Columbia.
- The Asian population is larger in Brookfield at 11% compared to 2% in Columbia.
- Columbia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Brookfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brookfield at 6% compared to 5% in Columbia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brookfield and Columbia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brookfield | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.7% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 6.9% | 13.1% |
Depression | 19.0% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 9.8% | 19.1% |
Binge Drinking | 24.7% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookfield vs Columbia
- In Columbia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 11.7% in Brookfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Columbia at 20.8% versus 19.0% in Brookfield.
- Columbia has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 9.8% in Brookfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookfield at 24.7% compared to 18.1% in Columbia.
- Columbia has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 31.5% in Brookfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Brookfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brookfield | Columbia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (102) | 0.4% (555) |
High School Diploma | 8.5% (3,547) | 8.4% (11,712) |
Less than High School | 2.9% (1,215) | 5.9% (8,257) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.3% (18,147) | 24.7% (34,575) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookfield vs Columbia
- In Columbia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Brookfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookfield hold a high school diploma at 8.5% compared to 8.4% in Columbia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbia at 5.9%, compared to 2.9% in Brookfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.3% compared to 24.7% in Columbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.