Demographics details for Bronson, MI vs Laconia, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bronson, MI vs Laconia, NH.
| Data | Bronson | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,309 | 17,086 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $47,159 | $67,856 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Bronson vs Laconia
- The population in Laconia is higher at 17,086, compared to 2,309 in Bronson.
- The median age in Laconia is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 39.7 years in Bronson.
- Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856, compared to $47,159 in Bronson.
- In Laconia, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Bronson.
- Bronson has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Laconia.
- The unemployment rate in Bronson is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics Bronson vs Laconia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bronson | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 78 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bronson vs Laconia
- In Laconia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Bronson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laconia at 93% compared to 78% in Bronson.
- Both Bronson and Laconia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bronson at 14% compared to 3% in Laconia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bronson at 7% compared to 2% in Laconia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bronson and Laconia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bronson | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 41.4% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bronson vs Laconia
- More residents in Bronson report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.9% in Laconia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bronson at 26.4% compared to 24.9% in Laconia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bronson at 22.7% compared to 17.2% in Laconia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bronson at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Laconia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bronson at 41.4% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laconia at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Bronson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bronson | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (11) | 0.4% (61) |
| High School Diploma | 29.2% (674) | 18.9% (3,229) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (302) | 12.6% (2,158) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (119) | 19.7% (3,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bronson vs Laconia
- A higher percentage of residents in Bronson have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Laconia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bronson hold a high school diploma at 29.2% compared to 18.9% in Laconia.
- More residents in Bronson have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 12.6% in Laconia.
- In Laconia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 5.2% in Bronson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.