Demographics details for Bridgman, MI vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgman, MI vs Whitehall, WI.
| Data | Bridgman | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,065 | 1,632 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $62,337 | $56,894 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Bridgman vs Whitehall
- In Bridgman, the population is higher at 2,065, compared to 1,632 in Whitehall.
- Residents in Bridgman have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 36.8 years in Whitehall.
- Bridgman has a higher median income of $62,337 compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgman at 45.0% compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- Bridgman has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Bridgman.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgman vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgman | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 85 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgman vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgman at 2% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- Bridgman has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 83% in Whitehall.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgman at 1% compared to 0% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 9% in Bridgman.
- Both Bridgman and Whitehall have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bridgman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgman | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgman vs Whitehall
- More residents in Bridgman report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgman at 24.7% compared to 24.0% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 16.0% in Bridgman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 19.6% in Bridgman.
- Whitehall has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 34.0% in Bridgman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgman at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Whitehall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgman | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (17) | 0.4% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (423) | 24.4% (398) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (115) | 15.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.7% (530) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgman vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgman have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 20.5% in Bridgman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whitehall at 15.7%, compared to 5.6% in Bridgman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.