Demographics details for Bricelyn, MN vs Rialto, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bricelyn, MN vs Rialto, CA.
| Data | Bricelyn | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 350 | 103,545 |
| Median Age | 48.4 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $42,083 | $80,750 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Bricelyn vs Rialto
- The population in Rialto is higher at 103,545, compared to 350 in Bricelyn.
- Residents in Bricelyn have a higher median age of 48.4 years compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750, compared to $42,083 in Bricelyn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bricelyn at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- The poverty level is higher in Rialto at 18%, compared to 8% in Bricelyn.
- Rialto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.5% in Bricelyn.
Demographics
Demographics Bricelyn vs Rialto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bricelyn | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 80 | -7 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bricelyn vs Rialto
- In Rialto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Bricelyn.
- Bricelyn has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- In Rialto, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Bricelyn.
- Rialto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 10% in Bricelyn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rialto at 17%, compared to 9% in Bricelyn.
- In Rialto, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bricelyn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bricelyn | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bricelyn vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Bricelyn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bricelyn at 23.2% compared to 17.5% in Rialto.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bricelyn at 18.6% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bricelyn at 19.9% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Rialto has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 38.4% in Bricelyn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bricelyn at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bricelyn | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (1) | 2.7% (2,754) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (65) | 18.6% (19,301) |
| Less than High School | 21.1% (74) | 30.0% (31,028) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (43) | 7.5% (7,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bricelyn vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.3% in Bricelyn.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 18.6%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rialto at 30.0%, compared to 21.1% in Bricelyn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bricelyn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.