Demographics details for Bowman, ND vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bowman, ND vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Bowman | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,894 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $79,709 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 1.9 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Bowman vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 2,894 in Bowman.
- Residents in Bowman have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Bowman has a higher median income of $79,709 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bowman at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 0% in Bowman.
- Gallatin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 1.9% in Bowman.
Demographics
Demographics Bowman vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bowman | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 89 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bowman vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Bowman.
- Bowman has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Bowman.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Bowman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 3% in Bowman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bowman at 2% compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bowman | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bowman vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.8% in Bowman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 19.2% in Bowman.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 17.0% in Bowman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bowman at 22.4% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bowman at 37.8% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Bowman and Gallatin at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bowman | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (14) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (626) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (442) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (442) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bowman vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Bowman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bowman hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Bowman have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 15.3% in Bowman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.