Demographics details for Boston, VA vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boston, VA vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Boston | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 406 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $50,694 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Boston vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 406 in Boston.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 31.2 years in Boston.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $50,694 in Boston.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Boston.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 12% in Boston.
- Gallatin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.2% in Boston.
Demographics
Demographics Boston vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Boston | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 96 | 15 |
| White | 4 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Boston vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Boston at 96% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 4% in Boston.
- In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Boston.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Boston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 0% in Boston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Boston and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Boston | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 46.4% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boston vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.8% in Boston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 18.6% in Boston.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 19.7% in Boston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 12.4% in Boston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Boston at 46.4% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Boston at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Boston | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (11) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 35.5% (144) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (21) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boston vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of residents in Boston have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.2% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Boston hold a high school diploma at 35.5% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 5.2% in Boston.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Boston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.