Demographics details for Boaz, AL vs Sterling heights, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Boaz, AL vs Sterling heights, MI.
| Data | Boaz | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,292 | 132,567 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 41.2 years |
| Median Income | $43,276 | $75,381 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Boaz vs Sterling heights
- The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 10,292 in Boaz.
- The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 35.9 years in Boaz.
- Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $43,276 in Boaz.
- In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Boaz.
- Boaz has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
- Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Boaz.
Demographics
Demographics Boaz vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Boaz | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 6 |
| White | 79 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Boaz vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in Boaz.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Boaz and Sterling heights at 79%.
- In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Boaz.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Boaz at 12% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
- Both Boaz and Sterling heights have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Boaz and Sterling heights at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Boaz | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.6% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 21.2% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Boaz vs Sterling heights
- More residents in Boaz report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
- Depression is more prevalent in Boaz at 25.8% compared to 25.5% in Sterling heights.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Boaz at 21.2% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 15.2% in Boaz.
- Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 36.1% in Boaz.
- Disability percentages are higher in Boaz at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Boaz | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (37) | 2.4% (3,134) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (1,861) | 18.8% (24,937) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (1,489) | 16.6% (22,008) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (1,024) | 22.3% (29,518) |
Education Levels Comparison: Boaz vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.4% in Boaz.
- In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 18.1% in Boaz.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 14.5% in Boaz.
- In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 9.9% in Boaz.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.