Demographics details for Bluefield, WV vs South san francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bluefield, WV vs South san francisco, CA.

Data Bluefield South san francisco
Population 9,408 63,484
Median Age 43.9 years 42.3 years
Median Income $45,854 $127,062
Married Families 36.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 12% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.6

Population Comparison: Bluefield vs South san francisco

  • The population in South san francisco is higher at 63,484, compared to 9,408 in Bluefield.
  • Residents in Bluefield have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 42.3 years in South san francisco.
  • South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062, compared to $45,854 in Bluefield.
  • In South san francisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 36.0% in Bluefield.
  • Bluefield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in South san francisco.
  • South san francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.1% in Bluefield.

Demographics

Demographics Bluefield vs South san francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bluefield South san francisco
Black 23 2
White 66 11
Asian Data is updating 45
Hispanic 3 30
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Bluefield vs South san francisco

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bluefield at 23% compared to 2% in South san francisco.
  • Bluefield has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, the Asian population stands at 45%, greater than 0% in Bluefield.
  • South san francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 3% in Bluefield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South san francisco at 11%, compared to 8% in Bluefield.
  • In South san francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bluefield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bluefield South san francisco
Mental Health Not Good 22.1% 12.9%
Physical Health Not Good 15.9% 8.8%
Depression 28.4% 13.7%
Smoking 21.4% 9.3%
Binge Drinking 12.0% 14.5%
Obesity 46.3% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bluefield vs South san francisco

  • More residents in Bluefield report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bluefield at 28.4% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bluefield at 21.4% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South san francisco at 14.5% compared to 12.0% in Bluefield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bluefield at 46.3% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bluefield at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in South san francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bluefield South san francisco
No Schooling 0.2% (21) 2.5% (1,583)
High School Diploma 19.0% (1,788) 13.7% (8,667)
Less than High School 16.0% (1,505) 14.8% (9,368)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (1,826) 30.4% (19,273)

Education Levels Comparison: Bluefield vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.2% in Bluefield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bluefield hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • More residents in Bluefield have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 14.8% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 19.4% in Bluefield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.