Demographics details for Blue mounds, WI vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Blue mounds, WI vs South jordan, UT.

Data Blue mounds South jordan
Population 924 83,513
Median Age 37.0 years 34.4 years
Median Income $71,094 $119,822
Married Families 34.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.4 3.7

Population Comparison: Blue mounds vs South jordan

  • The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 924 in Blue mounds.
  • Residents in Blue mounds have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $71,094 in Blue mounds.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 34.0% in Blue mounds.
  • Blue mounds has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 2.4% in Blue mounds.

Demographics

Demographics Blue mounds vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Blue mounds South jordan
Black 1 Data is updating
White 96 83
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 1 7
Two or More Races 2 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Blue mounds vs South jordan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Blue mounds at 1% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • Blue mounds has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Blue mounds.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Blue mounds.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 2% in Blue mounds.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Blue mounds.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Blue mounds South jordan
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.8% 9.0%
Depression 24.2% 26.5%
Smoking 11.9% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 25.4% 16.9%
Obesity 27.3% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Blue mounds vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.4% in Blue mounds.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 24.2% in Blue mounds.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Blue mounds at 11.9% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Blue mounds at 25.4% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 27.3% in Blue mounds.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Blue mounds at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Blue mounds South jordan
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 15.3% (141) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 9.0% (83) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.7% (182) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Blue mounds vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Blue mounds.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Blue mounds hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • More residents in Blue mounds have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 19.7% in Blue mounds.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.