Demographics details for Big springs, NE vs Waterford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big springs, NE vs Waterford, CT.
| Data | Big springs | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 408 | 3,276 |
| Median Age | 53.5 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $65,694 | $74,701 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Big springs vs Waterford
- The population in Waterford is higher at 3,276, compared to 408 in Big springs.
- Residents in Big springs have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 45.2 years in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701, compared to $65,694 in Big springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Big springs at 55.0% compared to 34.0% in Waterford.
- Big springs has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Big springs.
Demographics
Demographics Big springs vs Waterford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Big springs | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 75 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Big springs vs Waterford
- In Waterford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Big springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterford at 80% compared to 75% in Big springs.
- In Waterford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Big springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Big springs at 15% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Big springs at 7% compared to 6% in Waterford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big springs at 3% compared to 0% in Waterford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Big springs | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big springs vs Waterford
- In Waterford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.4% in Big springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterford at 24.0% versus 17.8% in Big springs.
- Waterford has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Big springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Big springs at 21.1% compared to 17.2% in Waterford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Big springs at 39.5% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Big springs at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Waterford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Big springs | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (3) | 0.5% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 19.4% (79) | 22.6% (739) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (90) | 5.9% (193) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (68) | 17.8% (582) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big springs vs Waterford
- A higher percentage of residents in Big springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 19.4% in Big springs.
- More residents in Big springs have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Big springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.