Demographics details for Big rapids, MI vs Surprise, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Big rapids, MI vs Surprise, AZ.
| Data | Big rapids | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,858 | 154,198 |
| Median Age | 22.8 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $36,058 | $87,756 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Big rapids vs Surprise
- The population in Surprise is higher at 154,198, compared to 7,858 in Big rapids.
- The median age in Surprise is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 22.8 years in Big rapids.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756, compared to $36,058 in Big rapids.
- In Surprise, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 17.0% in Big rapids.
- Big rapids has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Surprise.
- The unemployment rate in Big rapids is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.9% in Surprise.
Demographics
Demographics Big rapids vs Surprise provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Big rapids | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 5 |
| White | 80 | 63 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Big rapids vs Surprise
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Big rapids at 8% compared to 5% in Surprise.
- Big rapids has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 63% in Surprise.
- Both Big rapids and Surprise have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Surprise has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 4% in Big rapids.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Surprise at 9%, compared to 4% in Big rapids.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Big rapids at 2% compared to 1% in Surprise.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Big rapids | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Big rapids vs Surprise
- More residents in Big rapids report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.0% in Surprise.
- Depression is more prevalent in Big rapids at 27.4% compared to 20.1% in Surprise.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Big rapids at 23.5% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 15.9% in Big rapids.
- Obesity rates are higher in Big rapids at 38.1% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- Disability percentages are higher in Big rapids at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Surprise.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Big rapids | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (754) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (1,011) | 13.7% (21,050) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (278) | 7.6% (11,792) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (934) | 19.9% (30,735) |
Education Levels Comparison: Big rapids vs Surprise
- In Surprise, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Big rapids.
- In Surprise, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 12.9% in Big rapids.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Surprise at 7.6%, compared to 3.5% in Big rapids.
- In Surprise, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 11.9% in Big rapids.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.