Demographics details for Biddeford, ME vs Maple valley, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Biddeford, ME vs Maple valley, WA.
| Data | Biddeford | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,450 | 28,220 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,261 | $137,595 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Biddeford vs Maple valley
- The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 22,450 in Biddeford.
- Residents in Biddeford have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $63,261 in Biddeford.
- In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 32.0% in Biddeford.
- Biddeford has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.5% in Biddeford.
Demographics
Demographics Biddeford vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Biddeford | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 90 | 74 |
| Asian | 2 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Biddeford vs Maple valley
- In Maple valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Biddeford.
- Biddeford has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
- In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Biddeford.
- Maple valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Biddeford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 4% in Biddeford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Biddeford and Maple valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Biddeford | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 24.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Biddeford vs Maple valley
- More residents in Biddeford report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 25.2% in Biddeford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Biddeford at 17.9% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 18.1% in Biddeford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Biddeford at 33.1% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Biddeford at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Biddeford | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (72) | 0.4% (103) |
| High School Diploma | 20.3% (4,547) | 10.2% (2,878) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (2,103) | 3.1% (879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.8% (4,222) | 28.5% (8,032) |
Education Levels Comparison: Biddeford vs Maple valley
- In Maple valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Biddeford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Biddeford hold a high school diploma at 20.3% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
- More residents in Biddeford have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
- In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 18.8% in Biddeford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.