Demographics details for Bethlehem, PA vs Caruthersville, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bethlehem, PA vs Caruthersville, MO.

Data Bethlehem Caruthersville
Population 77,617 5,295
Median Age 35.9 years 36.8 years
Median Income $62,072 $35,585
Married Families 29.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 13% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.6

Population Comparison: Bethlehem vs Caruthersville

  • In Bethlehem, the population is higher at 77,617, compared to 5,295 in Caruthersville.
  • The median age in Caruthersville is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
  • Bethlehem has a higher median income of $62,072 compared to $35,585 in Caruthersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bethlehem at 29.0% compared to 26.0% in Caruthersville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Caruthersville at 20%, compared to 13% in Bethlehem.
  • Caruthersville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Bethlehem.

Demographics

Demographics Bethlehem vs Caruthersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bethlehem Caruthersville
Black 9 40
White 47 52
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 30 5
Two or More Races 11 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bethlehem vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 9% in Bethlehem.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Caruthersville at 52% compared to 47% in Bethlehem.
  • The Asian population is larger in Bethlehem at 3% compared to 0% in Caruthersville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bethlehem at 30% compared to 5% in Caruthersville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bethlehem at 11% compared to 3% in Caruthersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bethlehem and Caruthersville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bethlehem Caruthersville
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 17.0%
Depression 21.8% 25.6%
Smoking 18.4% 28.4%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 14.6%
Obesity 34.7% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bethlehem vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Caruthersville at 25.6% versus 21.8% in Bethlehem.
  • Caruthersville has a higher smoking rate at 28.4% compared to 18.4% in Bethlehem.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Bethlehem at 17.6% compared to 14.6% in Caruthersville.
  • Caruthersville has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 34.7% in Bethlehem.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Caruthersville at 27.0% compared to 13.0% in Bethlehem.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bethlehem Caruthersville
No Schooling 0.6% (452) 0.8% (42)
High School Diploma 16.9% (13,125) 23.6% (1,249)
Less than High School 12.9% (10,045) 23.0% (1,217)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.0% (17,044) 9.1% (484)

Education Levels Comparison: Bethlehem vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Bethlehem.
  • In Caruthersville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Caruthersville at 23.0%, compared to 12.9% in Bethlehem.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bethlehem hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 9.1% in Caruthersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.