Demographics details for Bethel park, PA vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bethel park, PA vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Bethel park | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,782 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $102,177 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Bethel park vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 32,782 in Bethel park.
- Residents in Bethel park have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Bethel park has a higher median income of $102,177 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bethel park at 49.0% compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 6% in Bethel park.
- Cleburne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 2.6% in Bethel park.
Demographics
Demographics Bethel park vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bethel park | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 93 | 52 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bethel park vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Bethel park.
- Bethel park has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- The Asian population is larger in Bethel park at 2% compared to 1% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 1% in Bethel park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 2% in Bethel park.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bethel park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bethel park | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 28.9% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bethel park vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.2% in Bethel park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cleburne at 23.6% versus 21.4% in Bethel park.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 13.8% in Bethel park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bethel park at 23.0% compared to 17.9% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 28.9% in Bethel park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bethel park at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bethel park | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (82) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,991) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 4.5% (1,471) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.4% (12,900) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bethel park vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Bethel park.
- In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Bethel park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 4.5% in Bethel park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bethel park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.4% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.