Demographics details for Berkeley, CA vs Roanoke rapids, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Berkeley, CA vs Roanoke rapids, NC.

Data Berkeley Roanoke rapids
Population 118,950 14,856
Median Age 32.5 years 40.5 years
Median Income $104,716 $45,732
Married Families 31.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 14% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.8

Population Comparison: Berkeley vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Berkeley, the population is higher at 118,950, compared to 14,856 in Roanoke rapids.
  • The median age in Roanoke rapids is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 32.5 years in Berkeley.
  • Berkeley has a higher median income of $104,716 compared to $45,732 in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Berkeley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Roanoke rapids at 18%, compared to 14% in Berkeley.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.5% in Berkeley.

Demographics

Demographics Berkeley vs Roanoke rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Berkeley Roanoke rapids
Black 8 35
White 48 50
Asian 21 1
Hispanic 12 6
Two or More Races 10 7
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Berkeley vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Roanoke rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 8% in Berkeley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Roanoke rapids at 50% compared to 48% in Berkeley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Berkeley at 21% compared to 1% in Roanoke rapids.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Berkeley at 12% compared to 6% in Roanoke rapids.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Berkeley at 10% compared to 7% in Roanoke rapids.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Berkeley and Roanoke rapids at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Berkeley Roanoke rapids
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 13.6%
Depression 18.8% 24.6%
Smoking 9.0% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 15.1%
Obesity 26.8% 39.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Berkeley vs Roanoke rapids

  • In Roanoke rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.0% in Berkeley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Roanoke rapids at 24.6% versus 18.8% in Berkeley.
  • Roanoke rapids has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 9.0% in Berkeley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Berkeley at 16.1% compared to 15.1% in Roanoke rapids.
  • Roanoke rapids has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 26.8% in Berkeley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roanoke rapids at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Berkeley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Berkeley Roanoke rapids
No Schooling 0.7% (780) 0.6% (93)
High School Diploma 3.9% (4,580) 20.5% (3,040)
Less than High School 4.0% (4,800) 14.5% (2,156)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 47.8% (56,907) 15.7% (2,326)

Education Levels Comparison: Berkeley vs Roanoke rapids

  • A higher percentage of residents in Berkeley have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Roanoke rapids.
  • In Roanoke rapids, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 3.9% in Berkeley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roanoke rapids at 14.5%, compared to 4.0% in Berkeley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Berkeley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.8% compared to 15.7% in Roanoke rapids.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.