Demographics details for Belmond, IA vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Belmond, IA vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Belmond Sterling heights
Population 2,404 132,567
Median Age 38.8 years 41.2 years
Median Income $55,233 $75,381
Married Families 44.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Belmond vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 2,404 in Belmond.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 38.8 years in Belmond.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $55,233 in Belmond.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 44.0% in Belmond.
  • Belmond has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Belmond.

Demographics

Demographics Belmond vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Belmond Sterling heights
Black 1 6
White 73 79
Asian Data is updating 9
Hispanic 16 2
Two or More Races 10 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Belmond vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Belmond.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 73% in Belmond.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Belmond.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Belmond at 16% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Belmond at 10% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Belmond and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Belmond Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 11.4%
Depression 18.9% 25.5%
Smoking 17.7% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 20.3% 17.7%
Obesity 39.9% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Belmond vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.9% in Belmond.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 18.9% in Belmond.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Belmond.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Belmond at 20.3% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Belmond at 39.9% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Belmond and Sterling heights at 13.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Belmond Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 21.0% (504) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 3.9% (94) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.3% (439) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Belmond vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Belmond.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Belmond hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 3.9% in Belmond.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 18.3% in Belmond.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.