Demographics details for Belmond, IA vs Crosbyton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Belmond, IA vs Crosbyton, TX.
| Data | Belmond | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,404 | 1,461 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,233 | $47,083 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Belmond vs Crosbyton
- In Belmond, the population is higher at 2,404, compared to 1,461 in Crosbyton.
- The median age in Crosbyton is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 38.8 years in Belmond.
- Belmond has a higher median income of $55,233 compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Belmond and Crosbyton at 44.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Crosbyton at 22%, compared to 10% in Belmond.
- The unemployment rate in Belmond is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.
Demographics
Demographics Belmond vs Crosbyton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Belmond | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 73 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Belmond vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Belmond.
- Belmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- Both Belmond and Crosbyton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Crosbyton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 16% in Belmond.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crosbyton at 16%, compared to 10% in Belmond.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Belmond and Crosbyton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Belmond | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Belmond vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.9% in Belmond.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crosbyton at 23.6% versus 18.9% in Belmond.
- Crosbyton has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 17.7% in Belmond.
- Binge drinking is more common in Belmond at 20.3% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 39.9% in Belmond.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 13.0% in Belmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Belmond | Crosbyton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.1% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (504) | 24.6% (359) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (94) | 37.1% (542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (439) | 8.8% (129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Belmond vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Belmond.
- In Crosbyton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 21.0% in Belmond.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crosbyton at 37.1%, compared to 3.9% in Belmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Belmond hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.