Demographics details for Bellingham, WA vs Laurel, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bellingham, WA vs Laurel, MT.
| Data | Bellingham | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,896 | 7,203 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $64,026 | $62,250 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bellingham vs Laurel
- In Bellingham, the population is higher at 93,896, compared to 7,203 in Laurel.
- The median age in Laurel is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026 compared to $62,250 in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The unemployment rate in Bellingham is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Bellingham vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bellingham | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 83 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bellingham vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bellingham at 1% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurel at 83% compared to 74% in Bellingham.
- The Asian population is larger in Bellingham at 6% compared to 2% in Laurel.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bellingham at 10% compared to 7% in Laurel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bellingham at 8% compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bellingham and Laurel at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bellingham | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 30.0% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 23.8% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bellingham vs Laurel
- More residents in Bellingham report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bellingham at 30.0% compared to 27.8% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 17.3% in Bellingham.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Bellingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bellingham | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (454) | 0.2% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 8.8% (8,220) | 21.7% (1,563) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (5,781) | 7.7% (556) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (27,095) | 10.8% (780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bellingham vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 7.7%, compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bellingham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 10.8% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.