Demographics details for Beaverton, OR vs Richardson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaverton, OR vs Richardson, TX.
| Data | Beaverton | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 97,053 | 118,802 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $88,899 | $94,362 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Beaverton vs Richardson
- The population in Richardson is higher at 118,802, compared to 97,053 in Beaverton.
- Residents in Beaverton have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362, compared to $88,899 in Beaverton.
- In Richardson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 6% in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.6% in Beaverton.
Demographics
Demographics Beaverton vs Richardson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaverton | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 12 |
| White | 57 | 49 |
| Asian | 12 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beaverton vs Richardson
- In Richardson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 3% in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 49% in Richardson.
- In Richardson, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 12% in Beaverton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Beaverton at 18% compared to 17% in Richardson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beaverton at 10% compared to 7% in Richardson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaverton and Richardson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaverton | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 31.3% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverton vs Richardson
- More residents in Beaverton report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaverton at 22.9% compared to 20.9% in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 16.6% in Beaverton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beaverton at 31.3% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beaverton at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaverton | Richardson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (619) | 1.4% (1,646) |
| High School Diploma | 9.8% (9,471) | 6.8% (8,041) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (7,010) | 8.4% (10,002) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.9% (33,872) | 36.7% (43,584) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaverton vs Richardson
- In Richardson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Beaverton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton hold a high school diploma at 9.8% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richardson at 8.4%, compared to 7.2% in Beaverton.
- In Richardson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 34.9% in Beaverton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.