Demographics details for Bear river city, UT vs New haven, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bear river city, UT vs New haven, MO.

Data Bear river city New haven
Population 878 2,409
Median Age 35.5 years 31.2 years
Median Income $66,250 $66,410
Married Families 46.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 2.5

Population Comparison: Bear river city vs New haven

  • The population in New haven is higher at 2,409, compared to 878 in Bear river city.
  • Residents in Bear river city have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 31.2 years in New haven.
  • New haven has a higher median income of $66,410, compared to $66,250 in Bear river city.
  • In New haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 46.0% in Bear river city.
  • The poverty level is higher in New haven at 10%, compared to 8% in Bear river city.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Bear river city and New haven at 2.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Bear river city vs New haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bear river city New haven
Black 1 1
White 81 76
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 9 12
Two or More Races 6 11
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bear river city vs New haven

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bear river city and New haven at 1%.
  • Bear river city has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 76% in New haven.
  • The Asian population is larger in Bear river city at 2% compared to 0% in New haven.
  • New haven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 9% in Bear river city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New haven at 11%, compared to 6% in Bear river city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bear river city at 1% compared to 0% in New haven.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bear river city New haven
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 10.8%
Depression 24.2% 24.7%
Smoking 11.0% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 20.0%
Obesity 34.3% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bear river city vs New haven

  • More residents in Bear river city report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.7% in New haven.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in New haven at 24.7% versus 24.2% in Bear river city.
  • New haven has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Bear river city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in New haven at 20.0% compared to 13.7% in Bear river city.
  • New haven has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 34.3% in Bear river city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New haven at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in Bear river city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bear river city New haven
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.2% (5)
High School Diploma 16.7% (147) 19.7% (475)
Less than High School 5.9% (52) 12.2% (293)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.6% (111) 24.8% (598)

Education Levels Comparison: Bear river city vs New haven

  • In New haven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Bear river city.
  • In New haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 16.7% in Bear river city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New haven at 12.2%, compared to 5.9% in Bear river city.
  • In New haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 12.6% in Bear river city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.