Demographics details for Basalt, CO vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Basalt, CO vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Basalt Massapequa park
Population 4,062 16,873
Median Age 46.2 years 43.7 years
Median Income $103,049 $161,193
Married Families 54.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Basalt vs Massapequa park

  • The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 4,062 in Basalt.
  • Residents in Basalt have a higher median age of 46.2 years compared to 43.7 years in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $103,049 in Basalt.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Basalt at 54.0% compared to 52.0% in Massapequa park.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Basalt and Massapequa park at 0%.
  • Massapequa park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.4% in Basalt.

Demographics

Demographics Basalt vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Basalt Massapequa park
Black Data is updating 1
White 85 88
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 6 5
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Basalt vs Massapequa park

  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Basalt.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 85% in Basalt.
  • In Massapequa park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Basalt.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Basalt at 6% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Basalt at 8% compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Basalt and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Basalt Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 14.7% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 8.0%
Depression 21.4% 17.9%
Smoking 13.0% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 19.2%
Obesity 21.2% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Basalt vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in Basalt report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Basalt at 21.4% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Basalt at 13.0% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Basalt at 19.8% compared to 19.2% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has higher obesity rates at 26.4% compared to 21.2% in Basalt.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Massapequa park at 9.0% compared to 5.0% in Basalt.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Basalt Massapequa park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 3.6% (148) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 2.4% (97) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 41.9% (1,701) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Basalt vs Massapequa park

  • In Massapequa park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Basalt.
  • In Massapequa park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 3.6% in Basalt.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Massapequa park at 3.8%, compared to 2.4% in Basalt.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Basalt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.9% compared to 36.6% in Massapequa park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.